The AIDS church are (I feel) aware of Duesberg, but, are afraid of all the back peddeling they will have to do. You can't keep truth down. Just imagine, NOW, they have to stand and face the world and say they are [were] wrong, and how they tried to truncate the thorough works of Duesberg [and others of his ilk].

Now we're coming to find out that a retroviruse is completely harmless, and does no harm to any one, not to mentioned that it is passed on from Mother to child (for millions of years), and not sexually transmitted. Soon, people will begin to see the light, and realize that it was the AZT (harrt meds), and undiagnose illness (left untreated) that causes the very problem, claimed to be, aids.

Also, maybe the gay community will come to realized that, YES, a lot of the discomforts that arised in the early 80's, could be, the result of a decade of burning the candle on both ends. I mean, after Stonewall, in the early 70's, it's no surprise that the gay community in the larger cities, could have, and/or did, shot their own immune systems down with an overt excess of party, drugs, and constant std's -- gone undiagnoses. But not solely saying others in the gay community participated, just the same. Eventually will be shown that 'heavy' poppers use to be one of the culprits in immune/health depletion. Which is so snorted in abundance in the gay community. Just a thought.

Glad you had a listen and read Torrid.

Terry

I checked out the video:

THE HIV VIRUS AIDS LIE: THERE IS NO HIV VIRUS:
www.youtube.com/watch

and was cracking up on how Duesberg was showing just how ridiculous the whole backwards belief(s) of the aids est, and how they had [have] people thinking the worst. He was breaking it down, and making common sense of the whole matter. Not to mentioned how the whole hiv=aids theory(ies) had gotten out of hand, marketed by a over zealouts.

His findings are clear: "No retrovirus (or any virus) just decides to pick on and select a particular group of people, Gay, or Black to target....or only chose one region - mainly Africa, and leave all others alone. But as long as the Aids Org/Est keeps up their theories of these groups being mostly carelessly sexually active (as if others aren't) and that's how hiv is past on, then it's this subtle level of bigotry that these same groups will pick up, and unknowlingly accept as their truth.

I would like for him to also challenge these supposed pictures what what is said to be active hiv, coming to life inside a person. And for his message of hiv antibodies meaning just what it means: A person had something, their own immunity (defense) had clear it up. Leaving only the antibodies that says, a person is fine now and CAN'T catch, give, or spread so-call hiv, to another person. That's the message that needs to get out in a BIG way to the public.

Not to mention that when we hear of a person being ill, that it could be from the meds (drugs), lifestyle choices (recreation drugs), or just simple, a person came down with a dis-ease that have been around sinse the dawn of time, before the AIDS Est. give life to hiv, and that a person should be treated for what ails them-- first. Not tested with a hiv test that may cross reacts with other ailments in a persons body, and then frighten to death.

This is the knowledge that gave me that 'ah-ha' moment, and that's when I started getting the word out to those, who didn't know about this. Or just wasn't adding 2 and 2 together.

T